answering some questions, part one (edited to add links)

As I wrote last year, I’m still struggling with writing about adoption — i.e., what to share or not, how to convey that which is not solely my own. I have always tried to retain some privacy for the others involved. Much as I want to write as it helps me process my own thoughts and emotions, I don’t because it may infringe on someone else’s story that isn’t mine to share.

So I was somewhat relieved for the opportunity to write about open adoption in another context. Curious single adoptive mom (international) O Solo Mama recently posed a series of (what she called “ignorant”) questions about open adoption, asking whether it is really beneficial or actually harmful. “I question whether most people have the stomach for open adoption or if it even best for most,” she writes. “Perhaps it is only best for those who can.”

We can only know our own experience; anything else may seem incomprehensible. Experience shapes our views and serves as the lens through which we see the world. Our personal experience in adoption, for instance, necessarily distorts our views, inherently limiting our ability to truly understand the experience of another in the constellation. In that sense, understanding adoption is somewhat like viewing a kaleidoscope, in that it looks different depending on who is holding it and how, with each turn bringing new light and a uniquely distinct perspective. Open adoption is also ever changing — a set of dynamic relationships that evolve with time, experience and perspective.

That said, I don’t claim to be any kind of “expert.” I can only speak from my own experience as a parent living in an open adoption with a 19 month old child who does not yet fully appreciate her origin story or realize its potential impact. Yet the decision to enter into a fully open adoption was made with strong interest and deep commitment based on what we believe will be best for our daughter.

While I won’t tackle all of O Solo Mama’s questions, I thought it was worth responding to a few here, with Part Two to come (because my answers are long).

Go take a look at how others including Lori, Dawn, Jenna, Heather, Susie, and A Life Being Lived have already responded.

“If open adoption is so great, why do so many people suck at it? By this I mean, not honouring commitments, closing the adoption, telling the other family they’re not ‘doing this thing’ correctly or playing the ‘for the sake of the child’ card?”

Like Lori, I’m not sure that “so many people suck at” open adoption. I think there is no single “right” way but rather what works in a given situation. Every adoption is different. Every family is different.

Many problems occur when expectant parents, birth parents and adoptive parents don’t share the same ideas or desires with regard to “openness,” or when they are not honest about what they really want.

Sometimes it’s not adequately discussed in advance. My sense is that most families in adoption are not well supported to build a strong foundation for a meaningful ongoing relationship. With few exceptions, I think most adoption professionals fail to educate expectant and prospective parents about the benefits of real openness — i.e., the child’s ongoing access to his/her family of origin, as opposed to merely sharing minimal information — and equally important, how to maintain a positive relationship over time. (We were fortunate to work with a highly skilled and ethical professional who is an exception to this perhaps broad overstatement.)

Sometimes both sets of parents don’t share the same understanding about what “openness” means in practice. What does being “family” mean? Calling every week or just on holidays? Monthly visits or annual? What about birthdays and other milestones? Without a shared understanding and ongoing honest communication, expectations on either side will inevitably breed disappointment.

The unfortunate reality is that some people also fail to honor the commitments they made. Contrary to popular belief, this happens not only with adoptive parents but with birth parents too. I don’t know how many adoptions start out open but become less so over time, or how many start out closed or semi-open and grow more open. No doubt relationships are dynamic. People change and grow. Our lives are busy and full. But there are so few valid reasons to walk away from such an important commitment.

It saddens me to hear of a birthparent who placed with the expectation of ongoing contact that has since diminished, or to think of a child whose access to his/her family of origin is restricted for no reason other than inconvenience or insecurity. While adoption affects all sides of the extended family, the interest of the child who had no choice in the matter should be paramount.

Perhaps it seems inane or goes without saying, but I think everyone in adoption should be required to give their best. It may not always be easy or comfortable, but when you enter into such a sacred commitment affecting the lives of others, I think you must honor it with your best self, even when that means doing more or better — i.e., stepping outside your comfort zone because you understand that your actions fundamentally impact others. If that’s what O Solo Mama means by “playing the ‘for the sake of the child’ card,” then by all means, yes.

Most importantly, I think it’s critical for everyone to be completely honest and authentic about their commitment to and capacity for openness. Open adoption is not for everyone, although I do think it should be the standard (more on that in Part Two). Yet even adoptive parents in a closed adoption can still act to convey a sense of openness and respect towards the child’s family of origin. I think the commitments we make are ultimately to the child.

“Do you ever feel like you should give this child back? Does the thought ever seize you totally as you watch your child with her bio-family: ‘ooops?'”

This question seems to stem from an insecurity about becoming an adoptive parent, regardless whether the adoption is open or closed. To be the best parents we can be, we need to overcome whatever fears or insecurities

If the question asks do I ever feel guilt or regret that I became our child’s mother, the answer is a resounding no. If the question asks do I ever wonder what their lives would have been like if our child was never placed with us, the answer is not really. If it asks do I ever wish I could eliminate any sense of loss or pain for our daughter or her birth mother, the answer is of course, but that is not possible.

When I see our daughter interact with her birth family, it gives me incredible joy to watch her connect with those whom she shares such deep roots, to see her soak in the love and attention of those who cherish her. She is still too young to appreciate who they are, exactly. Yet she knows they are family and that they adore her. By the time she understands her origin story, she will know that many of these people and their love have been in her life from the start.

There is a reason that our daughter’s birthmom decided not to parent. There are reasons why our child was not placed with a birth relative and why we were chosen to become her parents. Simply being chosen as her parents was such an empowering act. Through our open adoption, our parentage has been consistently validated as those closest to our daughter have treated us as her mama and papa from before she was even born.

Of course that doesn’t that mean it’s not hard when we see our daughter’s birthmom and try to imagine the range of emotions she might feel before, during and after a visit. But once she made her final decision to place our daughter with us, never have I questioned it. And she has repeatedly conveyed that she made the right choice.

I’m guessing kids are not hung up on how many relatives they have. Tell me that the thing that hangs up the public all the time about open adoption and other unconventional relationships—two mommies, two daddies, three, four, parents—is the least of your worries because it seems to me it is.

This is not even an issue for me. I don’t think this is even an open adoption issue but rather an issue of adoption in general, or any non-traditional family.

I don’t think we give kids enough credit. They understand step-parents and multiple grandparents and aunts and uncles and cousins. When we share our philosophy about open adoption, we often say you can never have too many people to love a child. A child in a closed adoption still has other relatives; they just don’t know them. We’ve heard from adoptees in loving families who spent a lot of time and energy wondering about and searching for people who look like them, who share their heritage. Knowing about the people who share your biology and ancestry should be a birthright. Even as mother to my child, what right do I have to restrict that?

NOTE: Part Two is now up. To read eloquent and thought provoking responses from some other Quakers in the house, see these answers by adoptive mamas Dawn of This Woman’s Work, Lori/Best Light of Write Mind Open Heart, and Heather of Production Not Reproduction, and birth moms Jenna of Chronicles of Munchkinland, Susie of Endure for a Night, and A Life Being Lived of Carrying a Cat by the Tail. Check out comments by others on the original post here.

~ by luna on January 11, 2011.

6 Responses to “answering some questions, part one (edited to add links)”

  1. Great piece, Luna. You sentiments resonate well for me as an adoptive parent (something I don’t write about much anymore since our open adoption is now a facet of all of our lives, rather than something to describe or explore due to newness)

    Recently a friend came to me to ask about open adoption, as she is considering this for family building (she and her husband are parents to two bio children ages 11 & 15). So her surprise at the features of our open adoption startled me a bit, since, as I mentioned, our open adoption was so “normative” to us by now. Yet I did make clear, as Zara’s firstmom and I both agree, our relationship is utterly unique and non-typical (whatever typical is) for an open adoption.

    Zara is at the age where she is starting to understand some of the particulars about adoption. She knows that J is her tummy-mommy, as she grew in her tummy and then she was “entrusted” to us after birth (you should hear “entrusted” spoken by a 3 year old!). She enjoys seeing J yet at this point doesn’t seem to have confusion or distress about the uniqueness of her situation. But again, she is 3 1/2 and there will be more levels of understanding to come.

    I tried to think of a similar euphemism for J, her birth father, but when I tried “tummy daddy,” the kid looked at me as if someone had lost her collective mind! So I explained that J & J “made” her and she grew in J’s tummy. So I will keep expanding the description as she gets older.

    Recently we went to see J for a visit. J took some photos with her cell and I took some (real) photos with my D700. As we were driving back home, she called to ask if she could post one of her photos on Facebook. She knew we’d say, absolutely, but still respected us enough to ask. I then asked if she minded my posting my (real) photos of her and Z on my Facebook page. Absolutely not, I told her.

    One of my friends saw the pics and asked, “Is that Z’s firstmom?” I’m like, “Yes it is.” And they gave me the “You’re incredible…so strong” response that seems de rigeur these days. But I’m like, what’s the big whoop. Z knows who she comes from as well as who are forever mommy and daddy are, so why is this any issue? J & J are family. Mason and I are parents, and so far, it is working out as well as can be expected or hoped for.

    Gee but I have run off at the mouth as usual. Just wanted to give you props for explaining the thoughts so well.

  2. I’m really enjoying seeing everyone’s answers to these questions—can’t wait for your part 2. =)

  3. Yes yes yes! So well put! “…when you enter into such a sacred commitment affecting the lives of others, I think you must honor it with your best self.”

    Nodding my head all the way through. You make some excellent points and now I’m going to have to stave off plagiarizing you when I write up some of my other answers.

  4. […] is Part Two of a long post (Part One) that attempted to answer some interesting questions posed by Jessica, a single mama through […]

  5. Ditto ditto ditto.

    When I think about going back to blogging I read something like this and think “there’s no way I could possibly write anything anywhere near as articulate as luna or lori or liana”.

  6. […] raised in my last posts, which were in response to some interesting questions about open adoption (part one and part two). The new Open Adoption Roundtable references the original post and links to replies by […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: